📢 Gate Square Exclusive: #PUBLIC Creative Contest# Is Now Live!
Join Gate Launchpool Round 297 — PublicAI (PUBLIC) and share your post on Gate Square for a chance to win from a 4,000 $PUBLIC prize pool
🎨 Event Period
Aug 18, 2025, 10:00 – Aug 22, 2025, 16:00 (UTC)
📌 How to Participate
Post original content on Gate Square related to PublicAI (PUBLIC) or the ongoing Launchpool event
Content must be at least 100 words (analysis, tutorials, creative graphics, reviews, etc.)
Add hashtag: #PUBLIC Creative Contest#
Include screenshots of your Launchpool participation (e.g., staking record, reward
XYO vs Competitors: How Does It Perform in the Location-Based Blockchain Space
What is XYO? (Overview of the location-based blockchain XYO)
XYO is a geospatial oracle network that uses the "boundary witness" protocol to prove the co-existence of two (or more) devices in time and space. The network consists of four roles—sentinels, bridges, archivists, and diviners, which respectively observe events, forward events, store payloads, and answer queries. These roles anchor real-world observations with cryptographic proofs so that developers can build location-aware applications without trusting a single data source.
Token snapshot (today): The trading price of XYO is between $0.011–0.012, with a circulating supply of about 13.48B XYO and a market capitalization close to $150M+.
How XYO Works (Bound Witnesses, Modules, and Queries)
Competitors: Who else is mapping the physical world?
To assess the strengths and weaknesses of XYO compared to its competitors, focus on the data they have collected, how this data is verified, and who is using this data.
Hivemapper (HONEY): Community-built street view map
DIMO ($DIMO): Mobility and Vehicle Telemetry
GEODNET (GEOD): GNSS corrections for high-precision positioning
XYO vs Hivemapper, DIMO, GEODNET: Side-by-Side Comparison
The decentralized map and location data ecosystem is rapidly evolving, with multiple projects offering unique approaches to collecting, validating, and monetizing geospatial data. Each protocol targets different data types, validation methods, and end users, creating unique economic models. The table below compares the performance of four leading projects in this field—XYO, Hivemapper (HONEY), DIMO ($DIMO), and GEODNET (GEOD)—across key dimensions.
| Standard | XYO | Hivemapper (HONEY) | DIMO ($DIMO) | GEODNET (GEOD) | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Core Value | Coexisting cryptographic proof ( binding witness ) | Street-level images updated by drivers | Vehicle and mobile data | GNSS/RTK corrections with centimeter-level accuracy | | Master Data | Proof + Details (Who/What/Where/When) | Dashcam Footage + Extracted Map Data | Vehicle Data (Travel, Diagnostics, Usage) | Satellite Signals + Calibration Data | | Verification | Multi-role architecture ( Sentinel → Prophet ) | Device-level capture; coverage and freshness measurement | Device integration + protocol incentives | Signal quality metrics, uptime | | End User | Applications requiring trusted location events | Map buyers, navigation, artificial intelligence | Drivers, insurance companies, fleets, mobile applications | Drones, robots, agriculture, surveying | | Economic Flywheel | Pay for validated location answers | Pay for map tiles/updates; reward drivers | Pay for data/services; reward data providers | Pay for precise data; reward sites |
Advantages of XYO (When to Choose XYO Over Competitors)
Where Competitors Surpass XYO (and When Not to Use XYO)
Market View: Today's XYO Token
Gate Style Tips: Trade and Track XYO Against Competitors
Bottom Line: The Position of XYO in Location-Based Blockchain Architecture
XYO is not a map, vehicle cloud, or RTK network—it is a proof layer that can sit beneath all of these. If your application requires verifiable location events across multiple devices and environments, the Bound Witness + Diviner model from XYO provides you with a flexible foundation. For highly specialized data—street-level imagery (Hivemapper), vehicle telemetry (DIMO), or centimeter-level positioning (GEODNET)—vertical networks still hold an advantage in depth and tools. The smartest strategy is often "XYO + vertical," using XYO to prove interactions while specialized networks provide the richest domain data.